Kebaikan sebagai Bahasa Universal Dunia dan Surga:  Analisis Konsep Domba dan Kambing dalam Matius 25:31-46

Stimson Hutagalung

doi:10.59177/veritas.v6i1.269

Kebaikan sebagai Bahasa Universal Dunia dan Surga: Analisis Konsep Domba dan Kambing dalam Matius 25:31-46

Stimson Hutagalung

Abstract

This research explores the portrayal of sheep and goats in Matthew 25:31–46 to affirm the significance of virtue as a universal language that applies to both earthly and celestial realms. The objective of this study is to examine the notion of sheep and goats in Matthew 25:32–46, with a focus on highlighting the significance of virtue as a universally understood means of communication that can be practiced both in the earthly realm and in the afterlife.The primary emphasis lies in how these instructions demonstrate commendable concepts that can be utilized in both tangible and abstract situations. A hermeneutical technique was employed in a qualitative study to analyze how sheep and goats are portrayed in Matthew 25:31–46 as emblems of universal benevolence. These findings significantly enhance comprehension of Matthew 25:31-46 by examining the significance of symbolism, providing many theological viewpoints, and highlighting the significance of universal benevolence in serving others with love.

Abstrak

Analisis ini mengkaji konsep domba dan kambing sebagaimana disajikan dalam Matius 25:32–46 untuk memastikan pentingnya kebaikan sebagai bahasa yang dapat diterapkan secara universal, baik di bumi maupun di alam sorga. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji pengertian domba dan kambing dalam Matius 25:32–46, dengan fokus menyoroti pentingnya kebajikan sebagai sarana komunikasi yang dipahami secara universal dan dapat dipraktikkan baik di dunia maupun di dunia. akhirat. Fokus utamanya terletak pada bagaimana instruksi ini memberikan contoh prinsip-prinsip terpuji yang dapat diterapkan baik pada keadaan nyata maupun metafisik. Metode kajian kualitatif dengan pendekatan hermeneutis digunakan untuk mengkaji representasi domba dan kambing dalam Matius 25:32–39 sebagai lambang kebaikan universal. Temuan-temuan ini secara signifikan meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap Matius 25:32-46 dengan mengkaji pentingnya simbolisme, memberikan banyak sudut pandang teologis, dan menyoroti pentingnya kebaikan universal dalam melayani orang lain dengan kasih. Kebaikan itu akan berpindah dari bumi ke surga ketika Yesus datang.

Keywords

Kebaikan; Kambing;Domba;Universal

Full Text:

PDF

References

Barker, K. L., & Kohlenberger, J. R. (Eds.). (1994). The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Zondervan.

Benner, J. A. (2010). New Testament Greek to Hebrew Dictionary.

Bocian, K., Baryla, W., & Wojciszke, B. (2020). Egocentrism shapes moral judgements. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(12), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12572

Brown, S. (1990). Faith, the Poor and the Gentiles: A tradition-Historical Reflection on Matthew 25:31-46. Toronto Journal of Theology, 6(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt.6.2.171

Calvin, J. (1999). Commentary on Matthew, Mark, Luke - Volume 2. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Publisher:

Cameron, C. D., Inzlicht, M., & Cunningham, W. A. (2016). The Ends of Empathy. In Rock Ethics Institute.

Chatterjee, A. (2016). Mother Teresa the Untold Story.

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2012). The Psychology of Gratitude. In The Psychology of Gratitude. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195150100.001.0001

Ferinia, R. (2023). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Panduan Lengkap, Tips, Trik, Teknik, Praktik. Media Sains Indonesia.

Grindheim, S. (2008). Ignorance Is Bliss: Attitudinal Aspects of the Judgment According to Works in Matthew 25:31-46. Novum Testamentum, 50(4), 313–331.

Halawa, J. (2024). Yakobus 2 : 1-13 : Meninjau Pentingnya Kasih Tanpa Memandang Muka. 2(1).

Korteling, J. E., Paradies, G. L., & Sassen-van Meer, J. P. (2023). Cognitive bias and how to improve sustainable decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129835

Kruger, M. J. (2016). Exegesis Of Matthew 25:31-46 With An Emphasis On The Identity Of “χδδ TώE σχTIτσS” χσD “TώE δEχST τό TώESE.”

Lumanze, O., Africa, W., & Seminary, T. (2023). Matthew 25 : 31-46 in the context of the needy and poor in Nigeria. November.

Menéndez-Antuña, L. (2017). The Queer Art of Biblical Reading: Matthew 25:31–46 (Caritas Christiana) Through Caritas Romana. Journal of Religious Ethics, 45(4), 732–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12198

Michaels, J. R. (1965). Apostolic Hardships and Righteous Gentiles. Journal of Biblical Literature, 84(1), 27–37.

Paiboon, P., & Wongwhaen, B. (2022). Ethical Leadership based on Universal Goodness of School Administrators. 5, 64–72.

Pratiwi, E., Negoro, T., & Haykal, H. (2022). Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum? Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922

Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan. (2017). Kisah Mereka, 5 Dokter dan Tenaga Kesehatan Indonesia yang Bekerja di Daerah Konflik dan Bencana.

Silva, S. Da, Matsushita, R., & Sousa, M. De. (2016). Utilitarian Moral Judgments Are Cognitively Too Demanding. OALib, 03(02), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102380

Simon, Y. R. (2022). A Critique of Moral Knowledge. A Critique of Moral Knowledge, 2(3), 168–171. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823290758

Soegijono, H., & Patora, M. (2020). Perbuatan Baik dalam Penginjilan Ditinjau dari Efesus 2: 10. Voice of HAMI: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 3(1), 39–50. http://stthami.ac.id/ojs/index.php/hami/article/view/20

Stevanus, K. (2018). Mengimplementasikan Pelayanan Yesus Dalam Konteks Misi Masa Kini Menurut Injil Sinoptik. FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika Dan Praktika, 1(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i2.21

Suratman, E., & Sugiono, S. (2023). Implementasi Ajaran Kasih Dalam Mewujudkan Sila Persatuan Indonesia Di Tengah-Tengah Kemajemukan. Phronesis: Jurnal Teologi Dan Misi, 6(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.47457/phr.v6i1.302

van Zyl, H. C. (2013). Discernment as “not knowing” and “knowing”: A perspective from Matthew 25:31-46. Acta Theologica, 33(SUPPL.17), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v32i2S.6

Vater, C., Wolfe, B., & Rosenholtz, R. (2022). Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29(5), 1531–1557. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02117-w

Via, D. O. . (2016). Harvard Divinity School Ethical Responsibility and Human Wholeness in Matthew 25 : 31-46. The Harvard Theological Review, 80(1), 79–100.

Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., Waltke, B. K., Boice, J. M., Tenney, M. C., & Polcyn, R. P. (1984). The Expositors Bible Commentary.

Warren W. Wiersbe. (2007). The Wiersbe Bible Commentary: New Testament. Published by David C. Cook.

Wilkins, M. J. (2004). The Niv Application Commentary. Zondervan.

Zagrean, I., Cavagnis, L., Danioni, F., Russo, C., Cinque, M., & Barni, D. (2023). More Kindness, Less Prejudice against Immigrants? A Preliminary Study with Adolescents. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59177/veritas.v6i1.269